Group Decision Making Term Paper Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1750 words - 1

Group conclusiveness Making - Term Paper ExampleThus, in cases where finale making involves technical aspects, tools and applications muster up in handy to the group members, whereas in situations that warrants identifying potential issues and challenges, brainstorming and discussions play an important role. How do groups arrive at conclusions that are mutually understood and accepted? What are the different dimensions involved in the group ratiocination making process? These are roughly of the questions addressed in this paper that illustrates the dynamics of group purpose making through practical insights and examples. Group dynamics and decision making process Groups comprising of number of persons endure an effective platform for enhancing performance at workplace or achieving common goals and objectives that form the primary debate for forming a group. Working in a group is riddled with challenges since individuals from different backgrounds, attitude and opinion come together to work towards common goals (OConnell & Cuthbertson, 2009). Coordination and cooperation among the group members can be challenging since arriving at a wholeness decision requires mutual understanding and empathy between the group members. The diversity in opinion, outlook and perspective clash at each stage of the decision making process thereby causing conflict and stroke to arrive at a single decision. However, the benefits associated to working in groups cannot be undermined since collaborative ventures can be more fruitful and have expanded potentials in terms of achieving the desired outcomes (foundation coalition, 2011). In order to get the better of these challenges decision making process within groups is guided by certain norms and statutes that help the group in arriving at a decision. The effectiveness of decision making in groups is realized in the fact that an individual could not have divvy upn the decision alone, the decision provides a perfect soluti on to the trouble, the decision is found on unbiased inputs provided by group members and contributes to the group objectives (foundation coalition, 2011). Johnson and Johnson in their book (2009) describe five plain methods of decision making that include decision making by imprimatur, decision making by majority, decision making by minority, decision making by expert and decision making by consensus. Among these methods decision making by expert and consensus are widely used in most scenarios. Group discussions and problem solving processes in groups are often presided by experts who can provide their valuable opinion and views in context that helps the group in making the final decision. Often the expert is one of the members of the groups and in some cases an external individual might be consulted or asked to preside over the discussions to enable the group to take judicious decisions. However, the primary challenge in this decision making approach lies in identifying a pri mal member of the group or external individual who is acknowledged as an expert in the give context by all members of the group. Group members who do not view the expert as an authority may be reluctant to implement the recommended decision (OConnell & Cuthbertson, 2009). Decision making by group consensus is unremarkably applied in teams working towards common goals and objectives. The term consensus implies that all members of th